In any event, in my view, the weighing of the evidence in support of the verdict is something for the appellate court, not for the trial judge. In all of the cases cited to us, it was an appellate court which weighed the evidence and decided whether the jury in reaching its verdict acted reasonably and judicially, and determined either to uphold or reject the verdict: McCannell v. McLean, 1937 CanLII 1 (SCC), [1937] S.C.R. 341, [1937] 2 D.L.R. 639; Vancouver-Fraser Park Dist. v. Olmstead, 1974 CanLII 196 (SCC), [1975] 2 S.C.R. 831, 51 D.L.R. (3d) 416, 3 N.R. 326.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.