In the case of Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia (1989), 1989 CanLII 2 (SCC), 56 D.L.R. (4th) 1, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 143, 25 C.C.E.L. 255, La Forest J. stated, at p. 38: ... Much economic and social policy-making is simply beyond the institutional competence of the courts: their role is to protect against incursions on fundamental values, not to second-guess policy decisions. The argument of the plaintiffs, if it is directed to a change in policy of the government as infringing the principles of fundamental justice, fails. Accordingly, there is no possibility that the plaintiffs can succeed with their s. 7 argument and the appeal is allowed in that regard. All of the provisions of the statement of claim that include allegations with regard to s. 7 of the Charter, or are based on alleged breaches of s. 7 of the Charter, are accordingly struck.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.