What is the test for a driver who deliberately causes a pedestrian to fall into the path of another pedestrian?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Jamieson v. Flint, 1996 CanLII 1757 (BC SC):

14 The law governing his action is that it must be shown that, driving reasonably, he had no time or reasonable opportunity to apprize himself of the unfolding events and to take action which would have avoided the collision. It is not enough to say the accident might have been avoided. Rajacich v. Potter (l976) 1976 CanLII 216 (BC CA), 21 B.C.L.R. (2d) 314.

Other Questions


Can a dominant driver be held liable for causing an accident where the dominant driver is speeding? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a bus driver liable for injuries caused by a sudden jerk of the bus driver? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a driver who backed his truck into a pedestrian who bent over and bent over to pick up her cell phone, causing her injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the respective obligations of drivers and pedestrians in circumstances where a pedestrian is struck by a vehicle while in a crosswalk? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the applicable law for a driver who is not a dominant driver but a servient driver? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there a general rule that there is 100% liability against a driver who rearends another driver? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for a driver who drives through a yellow light and is struck by another driver? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can knowledge of a cause of cause be used as grounds for cause of dismissal? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a driver required to anticipate another driver’s actions to avoid a collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where a pedestrian was struck by a motorcyclist while crossing the road in front of a pedestrian? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.