14 The law governing his action is that it must be shown that, driving reasonably, he had no time or reasonable opportunity to apprize himself of the unfolding events and to take action which would have avoided the collision. It is not enough to say the accident might have been avoided. Rajacich v. Potter (l976) 1976 CanLII 216 (BC CA), 21 B.C.L.R. (2d) 314.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.