The Court in S.M.S. v. D.M.T. 2016 BCSC 339 summarized the 4-step inquiry which is required to determine substantial success for the purpose of assessing cost at para. 5 which reads as follows: In Fotheringham v. Fotheringham, 2001 BCSC 1321, leave to appeal ref’d 2002 BCCA 454, the court set out a 4-step inquiry to determine substantial success which focuses on (1) determining the matters in dispute; (2) assessing the importance of those matters to the parties; (3) making a global determination of the matters in dispute to determine if a party was substantially successful; and (4) considering whether there are reasons to "otherwise order".
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.