In any event, there is a very real difficulty for the mother’s position on Article 13(b) in that a court in Nice can do the necessary to mitigate the risks if it finds them to exist. Having found that the child has been wrongfully removed, I presume that a signatory state — particularly one with such a highly developed legal system as France — can make orders to protect a child if a judge is persuaded of the basis for the making of such orders. See Sampley v. Sampley, 2015 BCCA 113 at paras. 38-41.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.