[67] At para [73] the Court in Kerr v. Baranow instructs that a monetary remedy must match as best it can the extent of the enrichment unjustly retained by the respondent. In other words, at the remedy stage the respective contributions of the parties are taken into account to address the disproportionate retention of assets acquired through joint efforts. This is not an “exact science”. “It calls, rather, for the reasoned exercise of judgment in light of all of the evidence.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.