An “apples to apples” comparison should be conducted to compare the costs of the regulatory scheme with all charges collected in respect of the regulatory scheme to ensure that the total revenue does not exceed the costs. If no surplus exists, then it is difficult, if not impossible, to characterize the charge as a tax. See Canadian Assn. of Broadcasters v. Canada, 2008 FCA 157, 292 D.L.R. (4th) 246 at para. 67.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.