Does a defendant have to pay costs when he is convicted of a criminal offence?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Rex v. Standall, 1919 CanLII 176 (SK QB):

And in Nicholls v. Hall, Keating, J., who alone deals with the question of costs, says: The appellant has been convicted of a criminal offence and obliged to come here. I think he should have his costs.

Other Questions


If an information can only be laid for one offence, can a person only be convicted of one offence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is there any ground on which the summons issued pursuant to the information respecting the May, 1961 offence relating to the offence respecting the date of the offence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a defendant have to prove that he was not a criminal at the time of his last conviction? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a party have a right to revert to the facts of an offence committed before the date of the offence when the offence was forgiven? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the principle of common law use in determining whether a person can be found guilty of a criminal offence under the Criminal Code? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a conviction lie for both sexual assault offences? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the costs of appeal costs for the claimant in a case that has been divided between success and success? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is contempt of an order registered under s. 13 of the Criminal Code of Canada a criminal or civil matter? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the rule against multiple convictions apply to a case involving the offences of driving with a blood alcohol content in excess of .08 coupled with the charge of driving while disqualified? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for an amendment by a magistrate to a criminal conviction? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.