What is the current state of the law in England and Canada on personal injury damages?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Andel v. Olesky, 1984 CanLII 1336 (AB QB):
This contingency concept has been accepted both in England and in Canada and I refer in particular to the following authorities: – Personal Injury Damages in Canada (supra) at pp. 121–124; – Trache v. Canadian Northern Railway, 1928 CanLII 154 (SK CA), [1929] 1 W.W.R. 100.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How has the court interpreted the definition of a personal injury policy in the context of personal injury claims? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there a plaintiff in a personal injury case who pleads a certain amount in damages and then amend that prayer as and when the extent of the injuries is learned? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on intervener status in a personal injury case? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the quantum of damages for a plaintiff in a personal injury action? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in Canada on the issue of same sex marriage? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in Canada on the issue of same sex employment? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the elements of damages for personal injury? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in Canada on medical malpractice? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in Canada on the issue of anti-abortion sit-ins? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in Canada with respect to oppression remedies? (Alberta, Canada)
