There is much merit in the comments of Madam Justice Southin in Stoney Creek Indian Band v. Alcan Aluminum, 1999 BCCA 527 at para. 37, that it is not “in the broad public interest ... that a profoundly important question of constitutional law should be decided without the vital facts, both those inter partes and constitutional.” I would decline, therefore, to address the judge’s reasons for judgment on the issue variously referred to as the constitutional issue on “taking up” or interjurisdictional immunity.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.