There is no principled reason to require that the connection be established by evidence relating directly to the third party where that individual is unknown. Such an articulation of the test ― designed, for example, to capture the motive, propensity or opportunity of a known third party to commit the crime ― would place an unrealistic burden on the accused. How could an accused establish the motive, propensity or opportunity of an unknown individual? (See, on this point, State v. Scheidell, 227 Wis.2d 285 (1999), at paras. 24-27.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.