Courts do not, however, always draw such a sharp distinction between the two concepts. While it is safe to say that fraudulent misrepresentation began as an action in contract and the tort of deceit has existed as a discrete cause of action since as early as Pasley v. Freeman (1789), 3 T.R. 51, the two closely related actions have increasingly converged as courts have begun to recognize concurrent liability in contract and tort.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.