In Vetrovec v. the Queen (1982), 1982 CanLII 20 (SCC), 67 C.C.C. (2d) 1 S.C.C., Dickson J. (as he then was), for the entire court, undertook a review of the common law requirement for corroboration and decided that it was time to simplify it. After a lengthy review of the law as it then existed in Canada and England, he wrote, at p. 17: I would hold that there is no special category for “accomplices”. An accomplice is to be treated like any other witness testifying at a criminal trial and the judge’s conduct, if he chooses to give his opinion, is governed by the general rules.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.