Does a chambers judge's decision that all matters proceed at one time, rather than two, be considered to be separate?
Prince Edward Island, Canada
The following excerpt is from M.C. v. R.P., 2009 PECA 15 (CanLII):
In Miles v. Miles, supra, the chambers judge’s decision was upheld. He decided that it was preferable if all matters proceeded at one time, and concluded that the husband had not demonstrated an urgent need for severance, nor presented any compelling evidence suggesting that it would be advantageous.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the appeal from a judge of the trial division in a small claims matter? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
In what circumstances will time consumption and cost considerations be considered in a personal injury case? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
How have the courts treated testimony that the respondent mother gave to a trial judge that she would return to Canada for the sake of the children? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
When a motion judge exercises her new fact-finding powers under Rule 20.04(2.04) and determines whether there is a genuine issue requiring trial, is it deference? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
Is a person’s choice of where to establish a home a personal matter? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
If there are no common facts or legal issues of relatively sufficient importance to both proceedings, should the motion be dismissed? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What are the reasons of a trial judge's failure to state that they have a reasonable doubt? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court in B.C. consider a third party order? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
What is the test for maintaining the status quo in a custody matter? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
When a motion judge exercises her new fact-finding powers under Rule 20.04(2.04) of the new summary judgment rule, is this a case of mixed fact and law? (Prince Edward Island, Canada)
