And again in Politzer v. Metropolitan Homes Ltd., 1975 CanLII 208 (SCC), [1976] 1 S.C.R. 363 at 374 [[1975] 5 W.W.R. 492], Dickson J. (as he then was), said: The central difficulty, it would seem, is that a single contract cannot readily be regarded as "merely personal" and at the same time as creating an equitable interest in land. Once an option clause creating a land interest is found to be void as infringing the rule against perpetuities, there is really nothing left in the agreement in the nature of a personal contract that can be specifically enforced.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.