A defendant is not liable in negligence unless their breach of the standard of care caused the plaintiff’s loss. The causation analysis involves two inquiries. First, the defendant’s breach must be a factual cause of the plaintiff’s loss. Factual causation is generally determined in accordance with the “but for” test; that is, the plaintiff must prove on a balance of probabilities that the harm would not have occurred but for the defendant’s negligent act: Marchi at para. 96; Clements v. Clements, 2012 SCC 32 at paras. 8 and 13. Second, the defendant’s breach must be a legal cause of the plaintiff’s loss, in that the plaintiff’s loss is not too remote. The remoteness inquiry asks whether the specific injury suffered by the plaintiff was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the defendant’s breach: Marchi at paras. 97–99.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.