The plaintiff contended, on the appeal, that the purchaser was bound by the provision in the agreement to the effect that he “accepts the title of the vendor of the said lands.” Words similar to these have been judicially interpreted, and the rule adopted is that which is laid down by the Master of the Rolls in Housfield v. Hodges, 33 Beav. 90 (55 E.R. 300), where it is stated: As to the acceptance of the title, I assent to this proposition:—that a purchaser is only bound by his acceptance of title, so far as he is made cognizant of it, and that if anything is kept back by the vendor he is not, as to that, bound by his acceptance.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.