The plaintiff points to the case of Snell v. Farrell 1990 CanLII 70 (SCC), [1990] 72 D.L.R (4th) 289 (S.C.C.) for the proposition that it is not essential for a medical report be provided to support the plaintiff’s theory of causation and that an inference of causation may be drawn without one. This would appear to apply only in the clearest of cases. Ultimately, though, the burden of proving causation still remains with the plaintiff.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.