The defence submits that if the plaintiff is unable to continue with his pre-accident line of work in the future, he has a duty to seek out alternate occupations which would be less likely to exacerbate his back problems. I agree that the burden is on the plaintiff to prove on a balance of probabilities that he could not earn a comparable income from some other occupation; see: Parypa v. Wickware, 1999 BCCA 88 at para. 67.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.