What is the burden of proving that there is more probable than not at a tribunal?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Knipple v. Daimler Chrysler Canada Inc., 2002 CanLII 54119 (SK PC):
“If the evidence is such that the tribunal can say: ‘We think it more probable than not’ the burden is discharged, but if the probabilities are equal it is not” Miller v. Minister of Pensions [1947] 2 All E.R. 372 at 374
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the burden of proving identity of a person to establish liability for injuries sustained by a dog? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a testatrix approved the contents of a will? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a bull was responsible for the death of a plaintiff? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a testator approved the contents of a will? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the burden of proving negligence against a defendant in a motor vehicle accident case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that the offence complained of has not been condoned? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for proving impairment by alcohol? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for proving an allegation of sexual assault? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a party affected by a decision of a statutory tribunal entitled to know the specific allegation which resulted in the conviction on the disciplinary charge? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a garnishee order against the executors of a judgment debtor have to prove that they are not personally charged? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
