How has the balance of convenience been interpreted in the context of balancing the books in a personal injury case?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from HZC Capital Inc. v. Lee, 2019 ONSC 4622 (CanLII):
In East Guardian v. Mazur, 2014 ONSC 6403 (S.C.J.), Penny J. at para. 39, described the balance of convenience as a consideration of whether the harm suffered by the applicant if the order is not made exceeds the harm that will be suffered by the respondent if it is.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the legal test for disbursements of personal injury compensation in personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the case law in the context of personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on personal injury representation in personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts in Canada dealt with the issue of personal injury cases involving personal injury claims? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts interpreted a limitation or exclusion of liability clause in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the fiduciary duties owed to a person in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of negligence in the context of personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What personal details have been disclosed in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the relevant case law for giving evidence from a third party witness in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a motion to add as parties to a personal injury action for personal injury costs granted? (Ontario, Canada)
