The argument in support of this proposition begins with a liberal and purposive Charter interpretation, which in turn requires positive governmental action in order to ensure that its citizens receive and retain the full measure of a right or a freedom. In such cases, it is argued, a posture of governmental restraint will not suffice to make even a freedom meaningful (L’Heureux-Dubé J. in Haig v. Canada (1993), 1993 CanLII 58 (SCC), 16 C.R.R. (2d) 193 at p. 221, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 995 at p. 1039).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.