The onus is on the party seeking to re-open to show that a miscarriage of justice would probably occur if the trial is not re-opened and that the new evidence would probably change the result; the wide discretion ought to be exercised sparingly and with great care: Hodgkinson v. Hodgkinson, 2006 BCCA 158 at para. 36. The application in this case is to re-open to introduce further expert evidence of doubtful consequence. The application to re-open is refused. In the result, the updated appraisal report is not admissible. Order
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.