It is a central feature of the applicant’s submissions that such language is inconsistent with the standard to be met for the issuance of a search warrant pursuant to s. 487(1) of the Criminal Code. That standard requires that evidence under oath establishes that there is a credibly based probability that something to be seized will, in the words of s. 487(1)(b), “afford evidence with respect to the commission of an offence”: Hunter v. Southam Inc., 1984 CanLII 33 (SCC), [1984] 2 S.C.R. 145, 14 C.C.C. (3d) 97.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.