The application judge concluded that the applicant had not demonstrated a reasonable chance of success for her proposed claim for lack of informed consent. He explained a doctor’s duty of informed consent by quoting a passage from Revell v. Heartwell et al., 2010 ONCA 353, 266 O.A.C. 184, which states in part that (at para. 42): Doctors must disclose all material risks to patients before proceeding with treatment. A material risk is one that a reasonable person in the patient's position would want to know about before deciding whether to proceed with the proposed treatment. ….
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.