How have the HRTO treated allegations of sexual harassment in an application?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Amazan v. Toronto Catholic District School Board, 2016 HRTO 218 (CanLII):

The applicant argued that the incidents detailed in the Applications are “thematically related” (see: Sinclair v. London Public Library, 2014 HRTO 781 (CanLII)) and therefore all the applicant’s allegations are timely.

Other Questions


Is there any case law relating to an accident benefit application where a delay in submitting the Application due to a personal relationship preventing the Applicant from making an application? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for adding a new allegation to an application to add to the list of allegations against the respondent? (Ontario, Canada)
What is considered to be "malice" in the context of allegations of sexual harassment? (Ontario, Canada)
What constitutes sexual harassment and sexual advance? (Ontario, Canada)
On the ground of urgency, in what circumstances will the applicant continue with her application for leave to continue with the application? (Ontario, Canada)
Can the very nature of sexual harassment be sufficient to establish that the sex of the applicant was a factor in the adverse treatment? (Ontario, Canada)
Can an application to introduce fresh evidence to support an allegation of sexual assault be successful? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with an application where the applicant's disrespectful behaviour was so extreme that the application was dismissed as abuse of process? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances have the LSUC suspended a member for sexually harassing a client? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the allegation that the complainant went upstairs to shower, as a preparation for sexual relations, was not put to the complainant in cross-examination? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.