The applicant further makes reference to Wade v. University of British Columbia, [1994] B.C. No. 1516 (B.C.S.C.). That was a situation in which the applicant was not recommended by that university's President for tenure, but the review in that decision was made directly to a court rather than to an arbitrator and in that case the applicant cites the following at para. 42: “Dr. Wade, having been given the right to be heard at every stage, it was for the President to determine the extent to which he would accept the recommendations of others.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.