The appellant also relies upon Dias v. Canada (M.C.I.) [2000] F.C.J. No. 1964 per O'Keefe J. at paragraph 18: In coming to the conclusion that I have reached, I have considered the applicant's activities in Canada, but it is my opinion as noted above, that it is next to impossible to establish a centralized mode of living in Canada in thirty-seven days of residency. I have also considered the fact that the applicant has no other residence except Canada, but in my opinion a centralized mode of living in Canada must be established before departure from Canada in order to have the time spent away from Canada apply to the residency requirement of 1,095 days.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.