After the appellant repeatedly failed to respect his disclosure obligations and failed to comply with court orders requiring financial disclosure to the respondent, the appellant’s answer was struck. Except in relation to the issues of decision-making responsibility and parenting time, the decision to strike the appellant’s answer was confirmed by this court in Burke v. Poitras, 2018 ONCA 1025, 22 R.F.L. (8th) 266. As a result, the matter proceeded as an uncontested trial.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.