The amended petition quotes extensively from the dissenting reasons for judgment of McLachlin C.J.C. and Arbour J. in Winnipeg Child and Family Services v. K.L.W., 2000 SCC 48 [K.L.W.]. The amended petition suggests that the law provides that a warrantless apprehension is unlawful, in part because the Director acts as both investigator and decision-maker. However, in K.L.W., the majority of the court upheld legislation which permits a warrantless apprehension of children and has provisions for a prompt post-apprehension hearing, even though the child protection agency in that case was in effect both investigator and decision-maker.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.