In Anderson v. Sullivan (not reported) dated June 27, 1977, Halvorson, D.J.C. (as he then was), refused to dispensed with the consent of the father, upon the grounds that the children in question would be cared for by the petitioner (in a stepparent petition for adoption) and his wife equally well, whether or not the adoption order was granted. He concluded that the children would suffer no disadvantages if the order was refused, nor incur any meaningful advantages if the tie with the natural father was terminated. Again the main consideration here was that the natural father would be deprived of his parental rights if the adoption order were made, and the learned judge said that these rights should be abrogated only for serious reasons, and none had been shown.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.