The question of accommodation to the point of undue hardship must be considered in context. As noted in Gardiner v. Ministry of Attorney General, 2003 BCHRT 41 (para. 164): …a respondent has a duty to inquire further where it has reason to believe that there is some question regarding a possible adverse effect of an employee’s medical condition or his ability to do the work prior to taking any action which would adversely impact on the employee.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.