The analytical framework for determining whether a family member will succeed in having the court re-apportion the assets of a deceased’s estate is set out in Tataryn v. Tataryn Estate 1994 CanLII 51 (SCC), [1994] 2 S.C.R. 807, (“Tataryn”). The test in Tataryn requires the weighing of competing claims of two sets of obligations: legal obligations and moral obligations. A child, as a rule, has no legal claim on a parent’s estate, so the question is the extent, if any, of the “moral” obligation. In Tataryn, the court held that, with two “grown and independent sons”, the moral claims “cannot be put very high”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.