In Taber v. Fritz the parties had applied by consent for a desk order under then Rule 44(13), for the production of documents in the possession of third parties. Those documents were again clinical records and hospital records as well as employment records. Although the parties had consented to the order the order itself was not endorsed by the third parties who had possession of the documents.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.