What is sufficient that a treatment that might assist the symptoms but rather than reduce the symptoms?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Torchia v. Siegrist, 2015 BCSC 57 (CanLII):
It is not sufficient that the treatment that might assist the symptoms, but rather, would have reduced the symptoms: Gregory v. Insurance Corp. of British Columbia, 2011 BCCA 144 at para. 56.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a plaintiff have an obligation to reduce their damages by reducing the damages in the context of a claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
How does a plaintiff have to prove an evidentiary link between her pain symptoms and the recommended treatment and care? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is differential treatment sufficient to establish discrimination? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a recommended treatment would have improved the symptoms? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for taking a recommended treatment to reduce damages in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where an affidavit from a legal assistant is not sufficient evidence to prove intent? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have an obligation to receive treatment to reduce their damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal obligation of a doctor to provide a patient with sufficient information about a proposed treatment or procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the court considered reducing spousal support when determining whether to reduce support for the new family? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for creating a benefit that singles out a disadvantaged group for inferior treatment or that gives rise to inferior treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
