In my opinion this case involves a collateral oral agreement which does not contradict the written form of sublease. Like the now classic Hawrish v. Bank of Montreal 1969 CanLII 2 (SCC), [1969] S.C.R. 515, hearing evidence of an oral agreement relating to financing and rent abatements “would not be contrary to the sublease” since it is silent on those issues.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.