British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from A.H. v. F.L., 2013 BCSC 1444 (CanLII):
The term “family debts” has no statutory significance in this province, but rather is a term that has developed in the jurisprudence to designate a liability of either or both of the spouses incurred for a family purpose. Whether or not any particular debt is a “family debt” turns on whether there is a discernible nexus between the debt itself and some family purpose or benefit: Bryan v. Chapman, 2011 BCCA 278 at para. 43.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.