Steel v. Lester, [1877] 3 C.P.D. 121, which is cited by North Ridge, is also distinguishable. In Steel v. Lester there was no written charterparty. The owner initially employed the master and paid him wages. The owner then contracted with the master for the master to operate the vessel and split the profits. The owner was either a partner with the master or his principal.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.