The plaintiff relied principally on the decision of Gibson J. in Clements v. Greenlaw, [2009] O.J. No. 2688 as support for his position that a status hearing is principally a case management tool and is not intended to be used, at least at an initial status hearing, to dismiss an action. He argues that it was open to the status hearing judge to reject the plaintiff’s allegations of prejudice, which he characterizes as bald assertions, and to accept the plaintiff’s oral submissions that the defendant would not be prejudiced if the action continued.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.