Is the looped road in Stanford Park an expressed right-of-way?

Nova Scotia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Nickerson v. Hatfield, 2013 NSSC 133 (CanLII):

I am unable to conclude that the Stanford Park regulations established the looped road as an expressed right-of-way. I find as a fact that the words in the regulations allow access to all cottages on Edgehill Avenue to be by way of Park Drive and Edgehill Avenue. It is common ground that both are right-of-ways. The deeds to the Edgehill Avenue lots state that it represents their eastern boundaries. The 1970 Melman plan indicate that the right-of-way was Park Drive and Edgehill Avenue. Applying the Shea v. Bowser, supra. points, I cannot conclude that the looped road is caught by the Stanford Park Regulations.

Other Questions


Is there an express legal grant? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on freedom of expression in Canada? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Can a dentist who wants to express his opinion at trial? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for a time limitation defence? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
In what circumstances can a plaintiff claim damages for misrepresentation in a property condition disclosure statement? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the appropriate table amount for a table amount in a personal injury case? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the effect of a prothonotary’s order in striking off a plaintiff? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the legal test for judicial review? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Can a living plaintiff recover damages for lost years? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the elimination rate of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood for each hour after drinking alcohol? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.