Is the looped road in Stanford Park an expressed right-of-way?

Nova Scotia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Nickerson v. Hatfield, 2013 NSSC 133 (CanLII):

I am unable to conclude that the Stanford Park regulations established the looped road as an expressed right-of-way. I find as a fact that the words in the regulations allow access to all cottages on Edgehill Avenue to be by way of Park Drive and Edgehill Avenue. It is common ground that both are right-of-ways. The deeds to the Edgehill Avenue lots state that it represents their eastern boundaries. The 1970 Melman plan indicate that the right-of-way was Park Drive and Edgehill Avenue. Applying the Shea v. Bowser, supra. points, I cannot conclude that the looped road is caught by the Stanford Park Regulations.

Other Questions


Is there an express legal grant? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on freedom of expression in Canada? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Can a dentist who wants to express his opinion at trial? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the quantum of damages that the Court will consider in determining the amount involved? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What are the damages for mould in a condominium unit? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have the courts treated expert reports in a medical malpractice case? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How much time have counsel spent on certain tasks? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for speaking "material change in circumstance" under the Divorce Act? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Can collateral benefits be deducted from a plaintiff's claim? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for having access to a child by a third party parent? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.