Furthermore, in Redpath v. Redpath, 2006 BCCA 338, Newbury J.A. observed at ¶42 that, while using the SSAG is not mandatory as a matter of law, if the quantum of the award was substantially outside the range provided for by the Guidelines it could, in the absence of some explanation for the difference, constitute an error of law reversible on appeal: ...Now that they [Advisory Guidelines] are available to provide what is effectively a "range" within which the awards in most cases of this kind should fall, it may be that if a particular award is substantially lower or higher than the range and there are no exceptional circumstances to explain the anomaly, the standard of review should be reformulated to permit appellate intervention...
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.