The plaintiff submitted that if reapportionment was ordered, then no award should be made for spousal support. I think this argument fails to recognize that a spouse may establish both a claim for reapportionment and a claim for spousal support, on similar and interrelated grounds, provided that there is no double recovery. See Toth v. Toth at para. 59.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.