Thus, mere speculation that a property could be rezoned will not suffice to constitute a particular use or the highest and best use of the property. See also Fritz v. Sicamous (District) (2004), 83 L.C.R. 286 (B.C.E.C.B.) at paras. 101-108 (holding that a possibility of severance of a property that was neither applied for nor approved was too remote and speculative to be considered in assessing market value).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.