I see no justification for the plaintiffs’ claim that costs should be on a substantial indemnity basis for the entire action. As stated by McLaughlin J. (as she then was) in Young v. Young, 1993 CanLII 34 (SCC), [1993] 4 S.C.R. 3, at para. 251: “Solicitor-client costs are generally awarded only where there has been reprehensible, scandalous or outrageous conduct on the part of one of the parties.” There is no suggestion that this case attracts solicitor-client costs, or its modern equivalent, substantial indemnity costs, on this basis.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.