Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Reid v. Galati, 2003 CanLII 18091 (ON SC):
The court in Roncato v. Caverly, supra, held that the evidence in that case disclosed at most a “tenuous nexus”, certainly not a “substantial nexus”, between the alleged negligence of the appellant in that case, and the person suffering the loss.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.