Drost J. found the plaintiff in Slinger was 75% responsible for the accident and the defendant was 25% responsible. In so doing, he held that the plaintiff was negligent in failing to recognize the defendant’s truck as an immediate hazard and the defendant, who was familiar with the dangers of the intersection, negligent for not acting sooner to slow down (see also Gautreau v. Hollige [2000] B.C.C.A. 390).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.