Counsel for the plaintiff contended that Sigvardsen v. Stanley, [1996] B.C.J. No. 1429 (S.C.), provides a more helpful analysis. There, the plaintiff was employed and turned over her paycheque to the defendant to pay most of the couple’s joint living expenses for many years. The defendant inherited property and earned income as an executor of the estate but rarely contributed any of the income towards household expenses. Eventually, the defendant acquired more property. The plaintiff continued to support him and also made some of the mortgage payments.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.