What is the relevant evidence to be adduced at a committal hearing?

Sidhu seeks to adduce evidence she says establishes that she did not travel to India in the latter half of 1999 or 2000. She asserts this evidence is sufficiently reliable to be admitted on the committal hearing and relevant to the committal test set out in United States of America v. Ferras, 2006 SCC 33, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 77 at para. 46. Sidhu says her proposed evidence could, when considered in combination with the rest of the Record, lead to a conclusion that the evidence offered by the requesting state essential to the committal for extradition is so manifestly unreliable it should be disregarded in determining whether the test for committal has been met. II. BACKGROUND 1. Relevant Excerpts from the Record of the Case