Chitty, J., states further at p. 306: "With regard to the other cases, there is Sicklemore v. Thistleton; but upon that it appears to me, there could have been little doubt as to the meaning of the parties that the demand did mean a demand, as was there held, the only difference in the case being that there was two covenants. It is not necessary to cite any further authority, and I am of opinion that the right of action did not accrue against the testator till demand made, and it is admitted that the demand was made for the first time in 1889. …"
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.