As for shared parenting, the court can take into account: • the devotion, love and consideration of the parents notwithstanding the acrimony between them: M.T.J. v. D.M.D., 2012 BCSC 863 at paras. 151-152 • the number of transitions from home to home which the children will face: Merriman v. Merriman, 2012 BCSC 757 at para. 16 • the fact it may not be appropriate or necessary to declare a primary residence. Week on/week off access provides for the important principle of maximum contact with both parents who are devoted to their children. It also reduces the number of transitions during the week and provides certainty for the children and their parents: R.D.L.J. v. D.S.J., 2011 BCSC 1721 at para. 18 • the role each parent has taken in the lives of the children is an important consideration when determining their residence: S.S.L. v. J.W.W., 2010 BCCA 55 at para. 32 • the principal which promotes maximum contact between the children and each parent does not necessarily mean equal time or alternative weeks is the ultimate goal: C.J.D. v. M.R.D., 2004 BCSC 1513 at para. 41
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.